Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Outside the Super Bowl Zone

There is an eighth dimension beyond that which is known to the normal football fan. It is a dimension filled with useless chatter, inane commentary, and Sean Salisbury and John Clayton yelling at each other. It is the middle ground between the diehard and casual fan, and it lies between the pit of John Madden’s stomach and Joe Buck’s self-righteousness. This is the dimension of ultimate media hype. It is an area that might be called... the Super Bowl Zone.

By pushing back the Super Bowl another week, the NFL has inevitably created one of the biggest media circuses in all of sports. From now until February 5, you will be bombarded from all sides with commentary, opinions, analysis, and interviews. The following paragraphs, however, will be an escape from that craziness for they have been written before the conference championship games and are therefore immune from the awful effects of the Zone. Being outside the Zone, however, means I do not know who will actually be playing in the Super Bowl, but don’t throw this paper down on the bathroom floor just yet.

Reproduced below are scouting reports previously available only to ESPN Insider members but now available to you, the GW law student, for free. Why are there reports for four teams instead of just the two Super Bowl teams? Because ESPN Insider is so in-depth that they scouted for match-ups that won’t even happen.

Seahawks Scouting Report
Despite playing the easiest schedule in NFL history, the Seahawks have exorcised their demons by making it to their first Super Bowl. With two weeks off, Shaun Alexander should have had plenty of time to recover from his concussion from the Redskins game. While the media hounded him for sitting out the NFC championship game, Alexander has responded with an amazing three days of practice, wowing his offensive line and quarterback. On the defensive side of the ball, rookie linebacker Lota Tatupu spent the last week complaining about not getting Defensive Rookie of the Year honors and looked sluggish against the Panthers, managing only to call out Panthers WR Steve Smith three times.

The Seahawks’s obvious weakness is Shaun Alexander’s lack of toughness. Getting a concussion after being hit for the first time this season against the Redskins was a bad sign, and defenses will be putting 11 men in the box to try to tackle him in the Super Bowl.

Panthers Scouting Report
The Seahawks had trouble containing WR Steve Smith, as he caught 57 catches for 526 yards and 1 TD in the championship game. In the ultimate display of trickery, RB DeShaun Foster- -broken ankle and all--limped onto the field on crutches for the Panthers’ first play. QB Jake Delhomme played - faked to Foster, and the entire defense bit, leaving Smith wide open for a 96- yard TD.

After that, the Panthers got a little uncreative in their play-calling, calling a hitch to Steve Smith for 32 straight plays. They’ll obviously need to mix it up if they expect Smith to repeat his NFC championship game performance, and Coach John Fox has told the media that they also plan on lining up Smith in the backfield.

Defensively, the Panthers’s corners have become a little cocky over the past few weeks thanks to their media recognition, giving the Seahawk receivers a 50-yard cushion on each play. Not impressed by the AFC crop of receivers, Chris Gamble and co. plan on starting each play on the sideline.

Broncos Scouting Report
Jake Plummer is one of the best game-manager quarterbacks in the NFL, which is a polite way of saying his coaches think he stinks. Nevertheless, he has gained the respect of his teammates for his excellent facial hair grooming throughout the season. I really don’t have anything else to add as the rest of the Broncos are quite boring, so I’ll end this report with some old stand-bys: if the Broncos run the ball more than 55 times, they will win the game.

Steelers Scouting Report
Safety Troy Polamalu seemed incredibly affected by the controversial interception call against the Colts. Although he picked off Plummer four times on Sunday, Polamalu dropped to the ground immediately after each and refused to get up for 5 minutes. RB Jerome Bettis was forced by Bill Cowher to carry around a football everywhere for the past week, reminiscent of that classic college football movie “The Program,” starring Halle Berry and James Caan. This tactic seemed to work as Bettis carried the ball (and the one from practice) 3 times for -2 yards and 4 TDs against a puzzled Broncos defensive line.

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

The Internal Dilemmas of a Football Fan

Watching football these days isn’t a simple matter like it used to be. In the beginning, you just rooted for your hometown team. Then, sports gambling was invented, leading to the invention of spreads and that movie with Al Pacino and Matthew McConaughey. Finally, fantasy football arrived, which gave the sports networks a reason to post individual player stats on the Bottom Line. Instead of merely watching the game to root for your team, you can have a larger vested interest. Without gambling or fantasy sports, would there be a reason to watch the travesty that is the Houston Texans?

Watching a game with fantasy implications can be a little frustrating. You’re not rooting for any particular team, just your own player. Some common annoyances suffered by the fantasy fan are when your wide receiver gets tackled at the one-yard line, when the backup running back gets the goal-line carries, or when the quarterback runs the TD himself instead of throwing it to your tight end. You can get equally frustrated watching a game you bet on when the other team scores a meaningless touchdown to cover the spread.

Being a hometown fan, fantasy fan, or gambler is hard enough to do each week. What happens if you try to wear more than one hat? This sounds like a smart idea at first, because there are only so many hours of football on each week (around 1342 maybe?), so why not try to maximize your viewing experience? However, you also open the door to extreme mental anguish. Luckily for you, I have spent many hours contemplating these situations, and I present to you my analysis.

Hometown Fan and Fantasy Fan:
This is the most common sports conflict today. How do you root for your team when their success will be detrimental to your fantasy squad? The simple approach is to concede one team’s defeat. This is relatively easy to do when: a) your hometown team is awful and out of playoff contention, or b) your fantasy game is already lost for the week.

The dilemma comes in when you need your player to perform and your team needs to win the game. On the one hand, you obviously want your hometown team to win, but on the other hand, you don’t want to concede defeat in your fantasy league. This is where creative cheering is useful. Let’s say you have a wide receiver on the opposing team. You can cheer for only him to score or get yardage, and when the running back gets the goal-line touchdown, you now have two reasons to be angry. If your player does score, it’s a win-lose situation, instead of The Internal Dilemmas of a Football Fan a lose-lose.

Another common situation is when you have players from your hometown team on your fantasy team. If your team does well, you hope that your player is the one responsible as then you’ll get to reap the fantasy benefits also. However, if he has a terrible game but the team still wins, then your enjoyment of the win is lessened. There’s clearly no bright-line rule to follow in this situation, so you’ll just have to wing it week to week.

Hometown Fan and Gambler:
As a general rule, you should not bet against your own team straight up. Simple as that. Betting against the spread is obviously a different matter. If you don’t think your team is going to cover, you shouldn’t rule out betting against them out of hometown loyalty. By doing this however, you open yourself up to the problems discussed earlier. If your team is giving a ton of points, betting against them means you’re rooting for a close game, which could come back to haunt you should the other team pull out the win. If your team should prevail and the other team covers, that’s an obvious win-win for you.

Fantasy Fan and Gambler:
This is an interesting predicament to be in and one I wouldn’t recommend. You open yourself up to all sorts of problems when you bet against the team which has some of your fantasy guys on it. If you bet for the team with your fantasy players, you effectively hedge your bets (winning $10 now as opposed to $100 at the end of the fantasy season).

If you really want to give yourself a headache while you watch, try the following: bet on the team with two of your fantasy players that’s playing the team with a fantasy player on your opponent’s team. Just for kicks, let’s say you are down 8 points in your fantasy league and this game happens to be the Monday-night game. To further spice it up, the opposing fantasy player is the kicker. Is there anyway you can win your bet and your fantasy game in this situation? If you’re taking the points, you need your fantasy guys to score all their team’s points to improve your odds. Then, if other team has a functional offense, you need them to only score touchdowns. If all those things happen and the team you bet on doesn’t end up winning because of special team or defensive touchdowns, then you will have pulled off a remarkable feat, one which will awe your friends for about five seconds.

Hometown Fan, Fantasy Fan, and Gambler:
If anyone wants to attempt this, please proceed at your own risk.

Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Wanted: Owner, Home, Some Offense

Changes Coming for Nationals Baseball

The media darling of the first half of the 2005 baseball season, the Nationals currently remain orphaned, as the team is still without an owner in its first offseason in Washington. The Nationals have been owned by the league since 2002, when former owner Jeffrey Loria sold the team to the league and then turned around and bought the Marlins. After designing the most expensive World Series rings ever, Loria then threatened to move his new team unless he got a new stadium.

Speaking of new stadiums, the Nationals are also due one of those. When the league finalized plans to move the team to DC last December, the city agreed to finance a $440 million new 41,000-seat stadium (the estimated price tag is now up to $535 million). This new park would supposedly be open by 2008 and be located on the Anacostia River, a block from the Navy Yard metro stop. Last Thursday, the league and the city met to hammer out the final lease agreement for the stadium, which is the last thing that needs to be finished before the new ownership group is selected.

There are currently eight finalists in the ownership pageant. The frontrunner appears to be a group headlined by venture capitalist Frederic Malek and also includes former Secretary of State Colin Powell. Malek was part-owner of the Bush-owned Texas Rangers and also managed Bush Sr.’s extremely successful reelection campaign. You, however, might have a much closer tie to one of the other prominent ownership groups in contention. In fact, you might be reading this column sitting in a building that bears his name.

Ted Lerner, who earned an LLB from the Law School and has several buildings that bear his name on campus, is also in the running. A self-made real estate mogul, Lerner has tried and failed for thirty years to buy a Major League Baseball team (he also was outbid by Mr. Synder for the Redskins in 1999). Lerner’s ownership group consists of only one person outside his family – Fox Sports broadcaster James Brown. A Lerner-owned Washington Nationals would certainly be beneficial to students – one of you could network your way into becoming the new, youngest GM in baseball.

The team’s current GM, Jim Bowden, was himself a former youngest GM in baseball when he became the Reds’ GM at the age of 31 in 1992. He is responsible for the highly successful Ken Griffrey Jr. trade and was also the baseball analyst for ESPN’s Cold Pizza before coming to Washington. Bowden also compared a potential MLB strike to 9/11 in 2002. Yikes!

Bowden’s success with the Nats has been so-so. Working with one of the lowest payrolls in baseball, Bowden assembled a team that was in first place heading into the All-Star break. The Nats then hit a brick wall and finished last in the NL East for the second-straight year. While the team excelled in close games at the beginning of the year, the team’s abysmal offense could not keep the wins coming in the second half (in fact, the Nationals finished dead last in every major batting statistic, a pretty remarkable feat if you think about it). $4.2 million of the team’s $48 million payroll went to shortstop Cristian Guzman, who was one of the absolute worst offensive players in the league, putting up what was arguably the worst offensive season for a regular in the history of Major League Baseball. Another $3 million went to 3B Vinny Castilla, who was just shipped out of town last week for Padres pitcher Brian Lawrence.

Bowden’s contract was only extended through April, leading Washington Post columnist Tony Kornheiser to suggest Theo Epstein as the team’s next GM. With the league expected to announce the new ownership group sometime in the next two weeks (maybe by the time you read this column), the Nationals can finally settle into their new home. With a new owner, stadium, and GM, the Nationals can work on building a quality franchise in the District. One suggestion for the new owners though: no ushers in the new stadium. Thanks.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Retooling the Worldwide Leader

For two days last week, the sports media had almost everybody across the country convinced that the St. Louis Cardinals were going to the World Series. After Albert Pujols crushed a Brad Lidge hanging slider in Game 5, the Cardinals were suddenly rejuvenated and would easily take the next two games at home en route to a second straight Series appearance. Game 6 came and went, and surprisingly, there was no Game 7 the following night, which left everyone scratching their collective heads.

How dare the Astros spit in the face of the sports media who had so caustically written them off days earlier! Don’t they know about momentum? You can’t stop momentum— it is the single most powerful force in all of sports. Once a team gets momentum, forget about it, it’s over.

There’s an obvious flaw in this little theory–if one team suddenly gets momentum, it must be at the expense of the other team. But if momentum is so damn great, how did the other team lose it in the first place? The Astros didn’t buy into this momentum hype and proceeded to blow up Busch Stadium a few weeks earlier than scheduled. I would daresay momentum might be just a tad overrated. Didn’t the Yankees have momentum in the ’04 ALCS? Up three games to none after clobbering the Sox in Game 3, the Yankees had about as much momentum as you can get. Despite this, they completely choked and the Sox triumphed.

So there goes that theory, if it even could be called one to begin with. The overall lesson here is that today’s sports media likes to attach a lot of value to vague romantic premises that can’t be proven one way or the other.

We could argue for hours about whether momentum means anything and still not come out any better than when we started. There’s not anything wrong with that, but it’s an argument that’s more appropriate for two friends watching the game to be having – it shouldn’t be the focus of SportsCenter’s analysis of the game.

This sort of oversimplification of sports will only have a negative effect on the intelligence of future sports fans. It’s a byproduct of the highlight culture–we want everything processed into 10-second sound bites and matched up with a witty catchphrase. Unfortunately, the highlight loses its appeal when that’s the only thing you’re watching.

There needs to be a better balance between the 10-second highlight and the in-depth analysis show. ESPN tries to accomplish this with specialized shows like Baseball Tonight and NFL Live, but these are often aired at inconvenient times (early afternoon and after midnight). ESPN.com offers scores of articles with its Insider service, but it will set you back $7/month. Maybe the solution is, dare I say it, another ESPN network?

Looking at the current programming across the Worldwide Leader, it’s pretty clear that there’s a lot of deadweight programming being aired. Pool, fly fishing, timber sports, cheerleading, stock-car racing–these niche sports should be moved off of ESPN2 and onto another channel (maybe ESPN could trade the rights to these sports to OLN for the NHL rights). That should free up some space on ESPN2. ESPNEWS is somewhat unnecessary with the amount of information available on the Internet. I don’t think we really need to see the press conference announcing the new NBA dress code.

And while I’m sure many people are clamoring for the second season of “Tilt,” that timeslot could be put to much better use (although I was sad to see “Playmakers” cancelled). We could also do without those sappy profiles on SportsCenter; they don’t really do anything except stir up people’s emotions and give Tom Rinaldi a job.

Instead, ESPN should air more strategy based shows, like EA SPORTS NFL Matchup. This program showcases football strategy and plays using the latest Madden game and could easily be ported to the other sports. What are the odds that this will happen? Probably slim, given that the ESPN brass has currently slotted NFL Matchup into the prestigious Friday night and early Saturday morning time slots.

So while you’re waiting for ESPN to do a massive content reorganization, try to spend less time watching highlights and more time watching entire games. The top-10 play is much more meaningful when you’ve experienced it in the context of the actual game. If we continue down this path any longer, we’ll reach a level of sports intelligence equal to the typical sports radio show caller.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

The NHLPA’s Failed Bluff

Bluffing is an extremely important element to the game of poker. By representing that you have a better hand than you actually do, you may be able to take down a much bigger pot than your cards should actually win you. In order to bluff successfully, you must convince the other players that you have pocket aces, instead of the unsuited 7-2 you were actually dealt. Bluffing, however, is not limited to card games, and recent labor disputes in professional sports have taught that it is often not without risk.

Every year, some NFL players threaten to skip training camp if they do not receive a better contract. Sometimes this strategy works and other times, like this year, the owners call the players’ bluffs, and they are forced grudgingly to report to camp. Terrell Owen’s attempt in August to renegotiate a new contract, while generating an inordinate amount of media attention, ultimately failed to get him a new deal.

Another group tried a similar tactic in the past year but ended up losing on a much larger scale – the NHL Players Association. Trying to negotiate a favorable new labor agreement, the players’ union instead lost the entire season and gained almost no concessions when the new collective bargaining agreement was finally reached.

After negotiations stalled between the owners and the NHLPA last fall, the owners instituted a lockout on September 15. The main point of contention between the two sides was the owners’ insistence on a salary cap linked to team revenues. The players strenuously objected to the cap, initially proposing a 5 percent salary rollback and a luxury tax, which the owners quickly rejected.

Negotiations stalled as game after game was canceled. Finally, in mid-February, with only hours to go before the season would be officially canceled, the players’ union made a major concession – it agreed to a $49 million cap per team, which was $6.5 million higher than the cap offered by the owners. When the two sides refused to meet in the middle, commissioner Gary Bettman cancelled the rest of the season on February 15, making the NHL the first major sports league in North America to lose an entire season over a labor dispute.

While an extremely- shortened season wouldn’t have been practical anyway, the union and the owners needed to quickly resolve their dispute and agree to a new CBA before another season was wiped out. On July 13, nearly 10 months after the lockout began, the two sides finally agreed to a new labor deal. Looking at the terms of the deal, only one conclusion can be drawn – the players got fleeced.

First, the salary cap. Instead of the $42.5 million cap that the owners initially offered back in February, the new cap will be between $37 and $39.5 million and is linked to league revenues. Of course, the cap can increase or decrease from season to season if the revenues increase or decrease.

Second, there will be a 24 percent rollback of existing contracts. Now, here’s where the players start looking like fools. The union originally offered the rollback as an alternative to the salary cap; they never intended both things to happen. So not only are the players stuck with a salary cap, which they originally said they would never agree to, their existing salaries will also be considerably reduced. Maybe next time, the union will remember to take a condition off the table.

Third, a player can make no more than 20 percent of the salary cap, so say good-bye to $10 million plus salaries. The salary of the league’s best players will max out at $7.9 million, which isn’t so bad until you compare it to the monstrous salaries that are being paid to NBA deadweights like Allan Houston, Penny Hardaway, and Keith Van Horn. (You know what other NBA player is making more than the NHL max? Maurice Taylor, who clocked in with a salary of $8.45 million last season. Does anyone even know who this guy is?)

In addition to these three major wins for the owners, entry-level salaries also were rolled back and bonuses were limited. The only minor concessions the players gained were a salary floor, an increase in the minimum player salary, and the lowering of the unrestricted free agency age. Were these gains really worth the loss of the entire season? Few would say yes.

With the return of the NHL last week, the players, owners, and fans can start to put this sorry mess behind them. The sport has a long way to go to recover its standing among the three other major sports leagues. The institution of new rules will hopefully make the game more exciting and watchable to the casual fan. More importantly however, both sides need to take away a valuable lesson from the past year – when the new CBA expires in six years, bluffing may only lead to hockey’s quick exit from the American sports scene.

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Scalping Sunday Ticket

Football season can be a confusing time for those fans away from their home market. The lazy Sunday you used to enjoy is now gone. Instead of being greeted by your team when you roll out of bed at noon and turn on the TV, you are greeted with the horror that is Baltimore v. Tennessee (no offense, Ravens or Titans fans). Of course, the NFL has provided a solution for its displaced fans for many years in the form of the Sunday Ticket package. For $280, DirecTV subscribers get (almost) every game live every week.

But there’s a catch. Unlike the other full season sports packages, NFL Sunday Ticket is only available on DirecTV. With a customer base of 13.5 million subscribers, DirecTV pal es in comparison to the approximately 90 million cable subscribers in the country. This means that a large portion of the television-viewing population cannot get the Sunday Ticket package. Even worse news, don’t expect Sunday Ticket to be available on cable anytime soon. Last year, DirecTV renewed its exclusive Sunday Ticket agreement with the NFL through 2010. The Rupert Murdoch- controlled company will now pay $700 million annually for the rights, while in contrast, CBS and Fox pay $622 and $715 million, respectively, for their games. While cable would have loved to get in on the action, DirecTV’s bid went above and beyond what any of the cable companies were willing to pay.

If this exclusivity deal seems a little monopolistic to you, you’d be right. In fact, one particularly litigious DirecTV customer brought a lawsuit against the NFL in 1998. In Shaw v. Dallas Cowboys, the plaintiff argued that the NFL’s joint agreement with DirecTV was a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The NFL countered with the argument that the selling of the rights was exempt from antitrust law under the Sports Broadcasting Act, which grants an antitrust exemption to “sponsored telecasts.” Sponsored telecasts refer to broadcasts financed by advertising, which is the category the regular broadcast games fall under. The NFL argued that the games available through DirecTV also fell under the exemption; however, the district court ruled that to apply the exemption to the Sunday Ticket games would effectively make the exception into the rule (this was later affirmed by the Third Circuit).

The suit evolved into a class action encompassing all Sunday Ticket subscribers. The parties eventually settled, with the plaintiffs getting a share of $7.3 million, discounts on NFL merchandise, and the opportunity to buy access to Sunday Ticket on a weekly basis. This initial agreement, however, was rejected by the district court because it was too favorable to the league (the NFL could rescind the weekly Sunday Ticket option after one season), and the attorneys’ fees were too high for the amount the plaintiffs actually received in the settlement (the attorneys got $3.7 million in fees while the 1.8 million members of the class had to split the settlement). The agreement was revised to increase the settlement pool by $1 million and also forced the NFL to offer the weekly Sunday Ticket package up until 2004.

So where does that leave you, the diehard football fan? Pretty much back where you started. For the immediate future, Sunday Ticket will still be in the firm grasp of DirecTV, but there are several possibilities for opening up Sunday Ticket access to the masses. While the simplest solution would be for the NFL to let cable companies offer Sunday Ticket, this could end up hurting cable customers in the long run. With Sunday Ticket available on cable, there would be a mass exodus from DirecTV, which could severely affect the ability of DirecTV to compete with cable. With less competition, cable companies would resort to their old monopolistic ways. This scenario is unlikely, as the NFL would not want to give up a single huge payment for several smaller payments. The NFL is also against the widespread offering of the Sunday Ticket package because it feels it would hurt ratings for the local broadcast games. So, any possible solution would have to balance the concerns of the NFL over local ratings, the necessity of maintaining a legitimate cable competitor, and the needs of the consumer.

Fortunately, a solution that satisfies all three of these concerns is already being utilized by another sport—baseball, with its MLB.TV service. MLB.TV, which, as of last year, already has a subscriber base of 850,000, provides streaming video of live baseball games to out-of-market fans, and this model easily could be adapted for the NFL. Instead of offering access to every game for every team, pricing instead could be on a per-team basis. This would prevent a decrease in local ratings and also insure that DirecTV’s subscriber base remains stable. Watching football is more of a social event than watching baseball, so many fans would prefer to watch the game on a regular television than on a computer. Still, by allowing broadcasting games online, the NFL would be able to give fans who don’t or can’t get DirecTV another viable viewing option.

For now, though, you’ll have to be content with heading out to your local sports bar to get your football fix. And maybe that’s not such a bad thing. Despite the overpriced food and drink, there’s nothing quite like taking in a game surrounded by tons of rabid football fans. Just try not to get into an argument with the guy wearing the Joey Harrington jersey sitting at the table next to you; he’s suffered enough.

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

GW's Second Best Sports Columnist

After reading the first issue of Nota Bene, the law school student newspaper, I noticed the extreme lack of a sports column, and, feeling I could to a better job than a bunch of space that didn't currently exist in the paper, I sent an email to the editor and was soon given my very own sports column, under the new moniker: Left-Wing Lock.

This new post left me as the single published sports commentator in the entire law school, and with it, a billionfold increase in editorial control. Also, I could make up my own column titles.

Wednesday, May 4, 2005

A Final Reflection On Cornell Sports

During my visit to Cornell as a junior in high school, I attended a Q-and-A session with other prospective students. While most of the questions were in the typical mold of the sort you would expect to hear (What’s the core curriculum? Are the students really competitive?), one girl asked, “Can the students playing intramurals use the same fields as the varsity athletes?” At the time, I thought this was the most ridiculous question that anyone could have asked. “Who cares about intramural fields? I’m here for the academics,” I thought at the time.

It is ironic that, five years later, I have spent a large portion of my time here at Cornell at both the intramural and varsity fields. Coming in as a freshman, I had no idea that I would stand in the pouring rain during a football game, get frostbite covering an evening soccer match, or play ice hockey in Lynah Rink. I’ve experienced a lot of things here as a fan, a reporter, and an athlete, and it’s these memories that I’ll look back upon years later and smile.

Thinking about how sports as a whole has impacted my college experience, I remembered those commercials on ESPN – the ones that asked, “Without sports, how would we know what we’re made of,” or “who would cheer for the Nimrods?” I’d like to that ask -- and answer -- that question now, based on my four years on the Hill.

Without (Cornell) sports….

Why would we hate Harvard?

Sure, they’re ranked higher than us in the USNWR rankings (along with every other Ivy for that matter), but how much can you really dwell on those numbers? The Ivy League, after all, is an athletic conference, not a research convention. We can complain all we want about Harvard’s grade inflation, but once a year when the men’s hockey team provides a beatdown of the Crimson in Lynah, we can forcefully assert our dominance. There was never a time that I hated Harvard more than after they beat us in overtime at Lynah East my freshmen year. When they came to Lynah three months later, the atmosphere and crowd noise was unbelievable, and Cornell got its revenge with a 6-3 thrashing of the Crimson. But then of course Harvard went and won the ECAC title in double-overtime, setting off another round of hatred.

How would we brag to our friends at other schools?

I’m sure your friends at USC or UNC really cares that Cornell’s nano-genomic research department is regarded as the best in the country. They’ll really lose sleep over that fact after watching their school’s highlights on SportsCenter. While people don’t normally think of athletics when they hear “Cornell,” the athletes and teams here have been making a huge splash on the national scene in the past four years. The wrestling team finished fourth in the entire country this year at the NCAAs, and senior Travis Lee won his second national title in three years. The men’s lacrosse team is currently ranked fourth in the country after posting its first undefeated Ivy season since 1987. They’ve also reached the NCAA quarterfinals in two of the past four seasons. Of course, the men’s hockey team has had an amazing run the past four seasons – a Frozen Four appearance, three NCAA tournaments, two ECACHL titles, and four Ivy League titles, not to mention two Hobey Baker finalists. We’ve also had a slew of All-Americans in hockey, lacrosse, wrestling, track, cross country, and softball.

What would we wear?

ESPN already touched on this question in one of their commercials by showing a clip from Nelly’s music video for “Air Force Ones.” While I sadly don’t own a pair of these coveted shoes, I do have an inordinate amount of Cornell sports clothing. Let’s tally it up – one Lynah Faithful shirt, three Cornell hockey hats, two Cornell hockey jerseys, one ECAC Championship t-shirt, three Frozen Four t-shirts, three Cornell hockey long sleeve shirts, three Cornell basketball t-shirts, two Cornell lacrosse t-shirts, and one Cornell football t-shirt. That’s two weeks worth of clothing right there.

How would we give it our all?

For those of us non-varsity athletes on campus, we are fortunate enough to have the largest intramural sports program in the Ivy League. I can think of no better activity that lets you take a much-needed break from studying and also lets you demonstrate to your classmates that you are, indeed, the best horseshoes player on campus. Thinking back to that Q-and-A session, I never thought the answer to that girl’s question would actually have any importance to me. Of course, now I know the answer – sometimes, depending on the sport and/or how far into the playoffs you are.

As this is my last column, tradition holds that I explain what my moniker, “I Never Kid,” actually means. To understand the relevance, we must travel back to the fall of 1968….

It’s the first day of class, and my father, a high school senior, is sitting in college physics (it’s a double period). The teacher was Mr. Landau--

the most nasty, ornery teacher in the school. He had a bad reputation and everyone hated him. Landau had a short gray crew cut and mustache like Adolph Hitler. His complexion was gray – gray mustache, gray face, gray hair. After a lecture for the first period, the bell rings, and Landau tells the class to sit quietly until the start of the next period. In between periods, a student comes into barging in, and flings open the door. The class, who had been sitting quietly, looks up at this kid. Landau then looks at the kid and asks, “Who are you?”

“I’m XXXXX,” the student says.

“Where have you been?”

“I’ve been in study hall.”

“Well, this class is a double period and you missed the first period.”

“You’re kidding!”

At this point, Landau bangs his fist on the table and screams,

“I NEVER KID!”

And he never did.

35 years later, this seemingly irrelevant story inspired the name for my column. As a kid, my dad would retell similar stories about Landau. Whenever I questioned the fairness of one of my parent’s decisions, my dad would quip, “I never said it was fair,” another Landau-ism, this one born after a student complained that he only got two points on a test even though he had the right answer (but the wrong work). This was in stark contrast to his usual grading policy of full credit for the correct answer and no credit for the correct work, and so the student protested about the unfairness of the new policy. However, the student was lucky to have received such a comment, as Landau typically answered an argument with, “So?”

While this story has nothing to do with sports, it’s a fitting title because of my preferred use of sarcasm in my columns. At times, I took the sarcastic route in my columns (such as my suggestion that hockey bring back the rover position as the solution to its labor woes or when I previewed the 2004 baseball season by comparing teams to their animal nicknames). Other times, “I Never Kid,” can be taken at face value (see my actual suggestions for repairing the game of hockey after the season was cancelled). Overall, I tried to take the middle ground because too much sarcasm gets old too quickly and too much seriousness makes a column boring. No one wants to be lectured about sports – people prefer to be entertained.

Though I had no central theme for my column topics, I always tried to write about something that was just outside the game itself, whether it be the sports media, business, or history. By the time you pick up a copy of the Sun, you’ve already heard everything you need to know about how the Yankees can get out of their slump, so you certainly don’t need another reiteration. Hopefully, I’ve given you a fresh take on some sports issues you may not have been thinking of.

At this point in the column, some thanks are in order:

To my mom: You’ve read every article I’ve written for the Sun over the past four years, edited my writing, talked sports with me, and always reminded me to do my work, thanks for your support.

To my dad: I know sports aren’t at the top of your list, but you still read most of my stuff anyway. I’ve relied on you for help with physics and computer science, and I appreciate it a lot. Thanks for your sense of humor and the stories above.

To Alissa: Every other week you ask if you’re going to be in my column, and at last, here you are. You never fail to impress me with all you’ve done in high school, and I’m sure you’ll continue to impress me once you get to Cornell this fall.

To my grandfather: For first cultivating my interest in sports and for quizzing me endlessly about sports trivia.

To the current Sun Sports Editors – Chris, Brian, Bryan, and Olivia: You guys work incredibly hard every day to put out this section. You’ve still got a lot of work ahead of you, so try to get some sleep.

To the past Sports Editors: Thanks for editing my columns and for molding me into a better sports writer.

To Mike Pandolfini: We’ve covered many sports together and have gotten two free t-shirts out of it. Good luck next year getting a reservation at Dorsia.

To the Cornell coaches and athletes: It’s been a pleasure covering your teams the past four years. I’m awed by your hard work and dedication.

To Sports Information: Your enthusiasm and friendliness has made my job a lot easier.

To my friends: You sometimes read my column; that was nice of you. Thanks for the experiences and the memories these past four years.

Finally, to the reader: Thanks for reading down this far. The best part about being a columnist is the positive feedback I’ve received from you.

Well, that’s it. I would like to leave you with one final piece of wisdom – the best water fountain on campus can be found in the ACCEL lab in the engineering library.

Wednesday, April 20, 2005

The Other Student-Athletes

The field lies empty as the sun rises on a Spring morning. As 1 p.m. approaches, droves of people appear in the distance. Soon, the once quiet field is alive with the sounds of softball, as teams begin to warm up for the upcoming games. With the blast of a horn, play begins. It is Sunday afternoon, and the intramural softball season is underway.

Cornell's intramural sports program, which has been around since the early 1900s, offers students the chance to compete against each other in some of their favorite sports throughout the school year. Intramural sports not only provide great exercise, but they can also help students blow off steam after a bad prelim grade. According to a study conducted by Professor David Kanters of North Carolina State University, participating in campus recreational sports can help college students lower stress-related anxiety.

Intramural records indicate that the All-Around Intramural Championship Trophy was first awarded during the 1927-28 academic year to Delta Chi, but recreational sports have had a presence on the Cornell campus since as early as 1904. Cornell's third president, Jacob G. Schurman, wanted to give non-varsity athletes the chance to participate in a variety of sports under the direction of the varsity coaches.

Nicholas Bawlf, who coached the men's ice hockey team from 1920-1947, was the first known director of intramurals, holding that position from 1937-1947. Before the advent of a full-time director, students were the ones responsible for organizing the intramural competition, and still play an important administrative role in the current program.

After being male-only for its first 70-odd years of existence, the intramural program at Cornell began offering competition for women during the 1974-75 academic year. Sigma Delta Tau and Alpha Phi were the first sororities at Cornell to organize teams in the women's division.

When the program changed its rules to allow men to compete on a single-sex team and a co-ed team, the number of co-ed teams competing increased dramatically. Rules were modified to encourage the utilization of women during the co-ed games. In co-ed basketball, a normal two-point shot is worth three points if a woman makes it, and a normal three-point shot is worth four points.

Dave Pearson is entering his second year as the Robert D. Kennedy '54 Director of Intramurals at Cornell, estimates a student participation level of 6,500 to 6,800 during the 2003-04 school year. Pearson, whose position is the only endowed one of its kind in the country, came to Cornell after working at Washington State and the University of Nebraska, where students take intramural sports very seriously.

"There was one particular individual at Nebraska who was on his ninth or 10th year as an undergrad. He had a degree, but he would sign up for one credit a semester so he could continue to play intramurals," Pearson said.

Pearson and new assistant director Betsy Johnson oversee the program, which offers over 30 different sports and events. Students are also involved in the day-to-day functions, as supervisors and referees. Seven senior supervisors and 13 student supervisors are responsible for overseeing the 150 officials during the games and solving any problems that may arise.

"We always tell the students that work for us that it's their program and we're just there to facilitate it," said Andrea Dutcher, who served as the director of intramruals from 1988-1996.

Jill Mikolayczyk '05 has been working in the intramural program since her freshmen year. After serving as a referee and scorekeeper in volleyball, basketball and floor hockey, she became a student supervisor her sophomore year and is currently a senior supervisor.

"Trying to keep everything on schedule and running smoothly and having enough officials on each field, that's probably one of the hardest things that I have to do," she said. "You have to take into consideration the ability of your referee and the level of the game they're going to be refereeing. You don't want to put a referee who's only had two games under his or her belt in a very intense fraternity game."

Running an intramural program the size of Cornell's takes a large organizational effort. While a software program takes care of scheduling games for the different sports, assigning referees to individual games is trickier, as there are not always a sufficient number of referees available. Being an official can be stressful at times, as some Cornell students are very competitive during intramural sports.

"They want intramurals to be, I think, as competitive as some varsity sports," Mikolayczyk said. "They see all these great referees on television and expect students that are just like them to be top-notch. Our officials are very good. A lot of them come in with no sports knowledge whatsoever, and I think that by the end of the year, their improvement is amazing."

One of the factors that must be considered when running an intramural program is risk management. The staff must ensure that the participating students are safe during the games. For sports like ice hockey, this means strict equipment requirements for all players and the use of non-contact rules. Riskier sports that were once offered by the intramural program at Cornell, such as fencing and box lacrosse, have been discontinued.

At the University of Notre Dame, the only school in the country to offer tackle football (most schools offer flag football as an intramural sport), extra safety considerations are extremely important. Equipment must be in excellent shape, interested players must sign a waiver form, and there are EMTs at every game. Despite the hazard involved, tackle football has a high participation level.

"This program is by far our most popular men's intramural sport," said Rich O'Leary, the director of intramurals at Notre Dame. "We do not have fraternities or sororities, so the dorm competition is quite intense. Dorms hold barbecues before or after the games, and some halls provide half-time entertainment. The championship game is played in Notre Dame Stadium."

Intramural athletes at Cornell also compete in the varsity facilities. The entire intramural ice hockey season is played in Lynah Rink, and the championships for flag football and basketball are played in Schoellkopf Field and Newman Arena, respectively. Basketball was an extremely popular sport last year, as a maximum of 160 teams registered to play across all divisions.

"I talk to the old intramural director about once a month, and when I called him and told him how many basketball teams we had, he just said, 'Holy cow!'" Pearson said. "He moved on to the University of Maryland, which is a basketball school, and we had more intramural teams than they did."

While intramurals provide great athletic competition for non-varsity athletes, every student hopes to one day win an intramural championship and the trophy that comes with it -- a T-shirt. Dutcher recalls one student who, having never won an intramural championship T-shirt as a student, purchased two intramural championship T-shirts at the Quill and Dagger Charity auction for $48. For those students at Cornell who have yet to win, another opportunity is just around the corner, whether it be in softball, indoor soccer, or dodgeball.

Never-before Published Column

Note: I wrote this column about the NFL Draft and then scrapped it in favor of an article I had written in my Writing for Magazines class about Cornell intramurals.

With the NFL Draft this weekend, we’ll be finally rid of those annoying Tom Brady commercials on ESPN. You know the one, “Tom Brady—didn’t even make the All Big 10 First Team, picked 199th in the 2000 draft, made the team in camp, won three Super Bowls in four years, hosted an awful episode of SNL last weekend, despised by everyone outside of New England. The draft matters! You’d better watch all 2258 hours of coverage on ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNEWS, ESPNU, and check out past year’s drafts on ESPN Classic!”

Thanks for pointing out the obvious, ESPN; that commercial definitely persuaded me to watch all seven rounds of the draft. That way, when the Jets’ sixth-round pick develops into an amazing player in four years, I’ll be able to say, “Hey, I knew taking C.J. Leak was a great move.” I’m surprised that ESPN hasn’t hired a psychic as one of their draft day commentators, so we would immediately be able to find out if Maurice Clarett will be the second coming of Ricky Williams.

The NFL Draft has the distinction of being the second-best draft to watch on television, but this is not that high an honor. First, you’ve got the NBA Draft, which generates so much buzz that we all tune in to watch the draft order a month ahead of time. Plus, it’s much, much shorter. With only two rounds and five minutes to make a pick, the NBA Draft is a sprint compared to the NFL marathon.

The NHL Draft is third on the list. This one is really exciting. Combine foreign players that you’ve never heard of and never seen play with Canadian junior hockey players that you’ve also never heard of and never seen play, and you’ve got all the makings of a ratings hit. (Oh wait, this year’s draft was cancelled a few weeks ago. Never mind). Finally, you’ve got baseball’s draft, which is conducted by general managers over a speakerphone. Plus, it’s a whopping 50 rounds. Yikes.

That brings us back to the NFL. Seven rounds, 15 minutes for each pick, 12 different teams of analysts, and … Mel Kiper, Jr. Yes, it’s going to be an exciting weekend. In the past two years, viewers have been treated to several interesting storylines. Two years ago, the Minnesota Vikings forever cemented themselves in draft day lore when they failed to make their selection in the allotted time. This led to a mad scramble as Carolina and Jacksonville submitted their draft selections in mere seconds, kicking Minnesota down to the ninth pick. Thankfully, this also gave everyone 30 minutes of their life back.

Last year’s draft featured Clarett’s failed legal battle and Eli Manning complaining about going to San Diego. However, with the dust settling on the 2004 NFL season, we can all see that the Chargers’ pick of kicker Nate Kaeding in the third round had much more of an impact on their season than Philip Rivers. What do we have to look forward to this weekend? Umm … the draft’s new location at the Javits Center? When Clarett will be taken? My mouth is watering.

I’m not too concerned what team ends up taking Alex Smith or Aaron Rodgers. In fact, I don’t think I’ll make it to the end of the first round, when the Jets finally get to their first pick. Besides, according to Mel Kiper’s bio, his first-round predictions are sometimes 80 percent accurate. You don’t even need to watch the draft at all with that kind of accuracy. Too bad you’ll have to pay for ESPN Insider to read anything Mel Kiper has written. While we’re on the subject of Mr. Kiper, is there anyone else in the sports world who spends so much time analyzing something that when you think about it is pretty meaningless? I mean, tracking the draft stock of college players is kind of pointless when he could be doing actual analysis during the season. Or, maybe he could be working as an actual scout for an actual NFL team. We don’t have an NBA equivalent of Kiper; maybe because it’s Jay Bilas would rather be doing analysis and color commentary during the college basketball season. Even though he’s not holed up in an office watching games via satellite all season, Bilas still does a great job during the NBA Draft coverage.

So there you have it—the NFL Draft is overrated. There’s no allure to who gets picked first (only two players picked first overall since 1998 are actually bona fide superstars right now) and it’s way too long. Instead of spending four hours inside this Saturday afternoon, I’m going to be at the Cornell-Princeton lacrosse game at Schoellkopf. Maybe you should be too. [I ended sleeping in and not going to the game]